Environmental scienceLesson 4 of 6 in the course Environmental Protection and Negative Externalities

Environmental Policy: Benefits, Ecotourism, and Marginal Costs

5 flashcards · 5 quiz questions · 5 match pairs · 5 fill-in sentences · English

Lesson progress
0 / 5

Your progress is kept in this browser only.Sign up to save it

Summary

Environmental laws can require businesses and communities to spend substantial sums to reduce pollution. To judge whether those rules are worthwhile, economists compare their costs with the benefits of cleaner air and water. This lesson explores the main benefits, evidence from the Clean Air Act, and the challenges of valuing health and human life.

All flashcards

What are four broad benefits of cleaner air and water?
They can improve health and longevity, support industries that rely on clean environments, increase property values, and provide enjoyment that does not require a market transaction.
What did the EPA's 1970–1990 Clean Air Act estimates indicate?
The EPA estimated costs of roughly $500 billion and a middle-range estimate of benefits of $22 trillion, about 44 times the costs.
What is the value of a statistical human life?
It is an estimate used to evaluate changes in mortality risk across a population, not a price assigned to a particular person. The EPA estimated it at $7.4 million in 2006 dollars.
What is an opportunity cost in evaluating a safety regulation?
It is the value of other health or safety uses forgone when resources are devoted to the regulation. Spending on one rule may leave fewer resources for other measures that could also save lives.
What is the marginal decision rule for increasing pollution reduction?
Continue while the marginal benefit of the next increment is at least as large as its marginal cost.

Quiz questions

  1. What did the EPA's 1970–1990 Clean Air Act study estimate about benefits and costs?Answer: Its middle-range estimate of benefits was about $22 trillion, compared with roughly $500 billion in costs.
  2. Why does an overall finding that environmental benefits exceed costs not prove that every regulation is worthwhile?Answer: The balance of benefits and costs can differ among pollutants and individual regulations.
  3. How should society decide whether to make one more increment of pollution reduction?Answer: Continue when the next increment's marginal benefit is at least as large as its marginal cost.
  4. Why can ecotourism encourage local residents to protect habitats and wildlife?Answer: Tourism revenue can give residents an economic stake in conserving natural resources.
  5. Why do economists examine pay differences between otherwise similar risky and safer jobs?Answer: Extra pay for riskier work can provide evidence about how people value changes in mortality risk.

Based on Principles of Economics 3e by Steven A. Greenlaw, David Shapiro, Daniel MacDonald (OpenStax), licensed CC BY 4.0. Adapted into a summary, flashcards and quizzes.

All Environmental science lessons