LinguisticsLesson 4 of 4 in the course Language and Communication

Language, Identity, and Power: Gender, Race, and Revitalization

5 flashcards · 5 quiz questions · 5 match pairs · 5 fill-in sentences · English

Lesson progress
0 / 5

Your progress is kept in this browser only.Sign up to save it

Summary

This lesson explores how beliefs about gender and speech shape everyday communication and how conversational behavior can create or reinforce power differences.

Mansplaining describes a situation in which a man explains something condescendingly, often to a woman, while mistakenly assuming he knows more than she does. The term was inspired by Rebecca Solnit’s 2008 essay “Men Explain Things to Me.” Solnit recounted telling a man that she had written a book about a photographer, only for him to lecture her about a book on that photographer—her own book, as he later learned.

All flashcards

What is mansplaining?
A condescending explanation in which a man assumes he knows more than the person he is addressing, often a woman, even when that assumption is mistaken.
What does a language ideology do?
It provides shared beliefs about how language works and what speech styles signify, shaping how people interpret speakers and interactions.
What conversational behaviors can affect power?
Interrupting, ignoring a contribution, claiming credit for someone else’s idea, and deciding whose knowledge is authoritative can all affect conversational power.
What speech features did Lakoff discuss?
Lakoff described features such as hedges, tag questions, euphemisms, emotional language, and forms of speech characterized as excessively polite or uncertain.
What did Hyde’s meta-analysis suggest?
It found little or no difference between boys and girls in several language measures, while some differences in conversational behavior were small.

Quiz questions

  1. Why are racial categories described as social rather than as clear biological divisions?Answer: Human biological variation is gradual, without natural boundaries dividing people into fixed races.
  2. According to Jane Hill’s analysis, why can mock Spanish have unequal effects even when a speaker intends humor?Answer: Its humor can draw on stereotypes while Spanish speakers face stigma or exclusion.
  3. In the AAE example “He be angry,” what does habitual be indicate?Answer: The anger is recurring or enduring rather than limited to the present moment.
  4. What is Standard American English (SAE) in relation to accent?Answer: A socially dominant variety; it is not English spoken without an accent.
  5. Which conditions can contribute to language endangerment?Answer: Coercive language repression and gradual economic pressure to use a dominant language.

Based on Introduction to Anthropology by Jennifer Hasty, David G. Lewis, Marjorie M. Snipes (OpenStax), licensed CC BY 4.0. Adapted into a summary, flashcards and quizzes.

All Linguistics lessons