Academic writingLesson 1 of 2 in the course Language, Identity, and Culture: Exploring, Employing, Embracing

Evaluating Antiracist and Inclusive Writing with a Three-Dimension Rubric

5 flashcards · 5 quiz questions · 5 match pairs · 5 fill-in sentences · English

Lesson progress
0 / 5

Your progress is kept in this browser only.Sign up to save it

Summary

This lesson introduces the purposes of antiracist and inclusive writing and explains how they can help writers communicate across cultural differences.

Antiracist writing actively identifies and opposes racism. It challenges racist ideas, methods, and behaviors and works to replace them with antiracist alternatives. The key distinction is active engagement: being not racist is not the same as taking action against racism.

All flashcards

What is antiracist writing?
Writing that actively identifies and opposes racism, challenges racist ideas, methods, and behaviors, and works to replace them with antiracist alternatives.
Why is 'not racist' not enough?
Not being racist describes the absence of racism, while antiracism calls for active effort to identify and challenge racism.
What does inclusive writing consider?
It considers what readers need and how they will interact with the content, making cultural ideas accessible without assuming readers share the writer’s background.
How can a writer provide cultural context?
A writer can explain the meaning or use of a culturally significant detail and include relevant description so readers can understand its importance.
How can writing build bridges across cultures?
By representing cultural experience thoughtfully, giving readers useful context, and creating opportunities for connection without erasing differences.

Quiz questions

  1. Which three dimensions does the rubric use to evaluate writing?Answer: Critical Language Awareness, Clarity and Coherence, and Rhetorical Choices.
  2. What characterizes a Level 5, or Skillful, performance on the rubric?Answer: Ample evidence of purposeful choices, clear cultural context, connected ideas, and consistent cultural awareness.
  3. Why should a rubric score be connected to specific evidence in a draft?Answer: Evidence explains what is working and helps identify what the writer should revise.
  4. What should a peer reviewer do before evaluating a draft’s separate rubric dimensions?Answer: Read the whole draft to understand its purpose and cultural focus.
  5. If a writing convention may disadvantage students whose cultural traditions differ from dominant expectations, what is an antiracist response?Answer: Examine whom the convention serves and decide whether to follow or challenge it effectively.

Based on Writing Guide with Handbook by Michelle Bachelor Robinson, Maria Jerskey, featuring Toby Fulwiler (OpenStax), licensed CC BY 4.0. Adapted into a summary, flashcards and quizzes.

All Academic writing lessons