Criminal lawLesson 1 of 2 in the course Actus reus

Omission Liability Across Criminal, Tort, EU, and International Law

5 flashcards · 5 quiz questions · 5 match pairs · 4 fill-in sentences · English

Lesson progress
0 / 5

Your progress is kept in this browser only.Sign up to save it

Summary

This lesson introduces omission as a form of legally significant conduct and explains when a failure to act can amount to a criminal actus reus.

An omission is a failure to take action. It differs from a positive act, such as striking someone or damaging property. The law generally treats omissions differently because requiring someone to act can impose a more demanding obligation than simply requiring them not to cause harm.

All flashcards

What is an omission?
A failure to take action. In criminal law, it can form legally significant conduct when a person breaches a relevant legal duty to act.
What is the general common-law rule about rescuing strangers?
There is generally no broad common-law duty to rescue a stranger, though legislation or a recognized responsibility may create a duty.
Why does the law distinguish omissions from positive acts?
Requiring someone to act can impose a heavier burden than requiring them not to cause harm, so liability for inaction generally requires a recognized duty.
What does the traditional drowning example illustrate?
A bystander who merely watches a stranger drown does not ordinarily incur criminal liability for failing to rescue them when no legal duty applies.
What was significant about R v Dytham?
An on-duty police officer's deliberate and sufficiently serious neglect of his public responsibilities supported a conviction for willful misconduct in public office.

Quiz questions

  1. In R v Miller, why could the defendant's failure to address the fire support criminal liability?Answer: He became aware of a danger he had created and failed to take reasonable steps to address it.
  2. What principle did R v Pittwood illustrate about contractual duties?Answer: A duty arising from a contract can, in appropriate circumstances, support criminal liability for an omission.
  3. Why was the manslaughter conviction quashed in R v Khan & Khan?Answer: The defendants had not accepted a duty to act before the girl took the heroin.
  4. Why can establishing a duty of care be more difficult when a negligence claim concerns an omission?Answer: A duty to take positive steps can impose a heavier burden than a duty not to cause harm.
  5. What distinction did Airedale NHS Trust v Bland draw regarding treatment?Answer: Withdrawing ongoing treatment may be lawful in appropriate circumstances, unlike administering a lethal drug to cause death.

Based on the Wikipedia article Omission (law), licensed CC BY-SA 4.0. Adapted into a summary, flashcards and quizzes.

All Criminal law lessons