EthicsLesson 1 of 1 in the course Ethics from Antiquity to the Present

Utilitarianism from Bentham to Mill: Consequences, Rights, and Business

5 flashcards · 5 quiz questions · 5 match pairs · 5 fill-in sentences · English

Lesson progress
0 / 5

Your progress is kept in this browser only.Sign up to save it

Summary

This lesson introduces Jeremy Bentham’s central idea: ethical decisions should aim to produce the greatest happiness for the greatest number. It explains why Bentham focused on consequences and how he tried to measure utility.

Jeremy Bentham (1748–1842) argued that human beings are fundamentally guided by two experiences: the pursuit of pleasure and the avoidance of pain. He treated this as a basic fact about human behavior and made it the foundation of his ethical system, utilitarianism.

All flashcards

What is utilitarianism?
An ethical approach that evaluates actions by their consequences and aims to maximize overall happiness or utility.
What is Bentham’s greatest happiness principle?
The principle that social morals and legislation should aim to produce the greatest happiness for the greatest number.
What does utility mean in Bentham’s theory?
The value of an action or thing in terms of how much it increases pleasure or reduces pain.
What is consequentialism?
The view that an action’s moral status depends on its consequences.
What is Mill’s harm principle?
Coercion against a person’s will is justified only to prevent harm to others.

Quiz questions

  1. What makes utilitarianism a form of consequentialism?Answer: It judges actions by the consequences they are expected to produce.
  2. In Bentham’s account, what does universality mean?Answer: The approach applies across human actions, including altruistic ones.
  3. Jon intends to kill someone but misses; Matt intends only to frighten that person but accidentally kills them. What distinction does this case highlight for utilitarian analysis?Answer: The contrast between an action’s outcome and the actor’s intention.
  4. According to Mill’s harm principle, when may society coerce someone against their will?Answer: When coercion is needed to prevent harm to other people.
  5. Why is a business analysis that counts only financial results for owners incomplete as a utilitarian assessment?Answer: It leaves out consequences for other affected stakeholders and externalities.

Based on Business Ethics by Stephen M. Byars, Kurt Stanberry (OpenStax), licensed CC BY 4.0. Adapted into a summary, flashcards and quizzes.

All Ethics lessons